City and State Officials Take Action Hoping To Avoid Disaster
In a statement released Friday from the governor's office, Deal stated, “It is my hope that the district will take the appropriate steps to move forward in order to avoid a sad and embarrassing situation." By signing the bill, Deal hopes to to avoid the "horrific consequences" that communities face when schools lose their accreditation.
Loss of accreditation in a community is thought to effect residential property values, students educational success, and many other areas.
State officials and Atlanta's mayor, Kasim Reed are voicing their concern following a downgrade by SACS on January 18th, which gave Atlanta Public Schools Board only 9 months to correct deficiencies in six areas.
Calling it an assessment, Reed has previously stated that a review in July 2011 was more than fair. "The public deserves to know before the final report is due September 30th, what work we have done to save the accreditation for the city of Atlanta," said Reed.
Lamenting what a extended probationary period would mean, Reed states, "Right now Clayton County is finishing up a 24 month probationary period. Can you imagine what would happen if Atlanta loses it's accreditation and has to go through a 24 month process? That's two years. That means that this issue would have taken 3 years of the voting public's time." [It may be acceptable to them] that's not acceptable to me," said Reed.
The mayor continues to be outspoken in his belief that the Atlanta Public Schools Board under the leadership of Chairman Khaatim Sherrer El are incapable of bringing the district in to compliance by September 30th.
On the heels of the passage of state bill 79, Reed is now seeking legislation from the Georgia General Assembly that would temporarily empower him to appoint additional Atlanta Public Schools Board members. By doing so, the mayor may be attempting to gain control of the nine member board, thereby breaking up a long standing, five-count controlling vote.
An impending showdown continues to loom in Georgia's state capital on Friday. Even as newly seated governor, Nathan Deal, signed state bill 79 with bipartisan legislative approval. The bill gives Atlanta Public Schools Board until July to bring the district into compliance with Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) requirements.
In addition, the bill also allows the governor to remove school board members if those requirements are not met in July. The date comes 60 days before final reassessment of the district is scheduled by SACS late September.
Loss of accreditation in a community is thought to effect residential property values, students educational success, and many other areas.
State officials and Atlanta's mayor, Kasim Reed are voicing their concern following a downgrade by SACS on January 18th, which gave Atlanta Public Schools Board only 9 months to correct deficiencies in six areas.
Calling it an assessment, Reed has previously stated that a review in July 2011 was more than fair. "The public deserves to know before the final report is due September 30th, what work we have done to save the accreditation for the city of Atlanta," said Reed.
Lamenting what a extended probationary period would mean, Reed states, "Right now Clayton County is finishing up a 24 month probationary period. Can you imagine what would happen if Atlanta loses it's accreditation and has to go through a 24 month process? That's two years. That means that this issue would have taken 3 years of the voting public's time." [It may be acceptable to them] that's not acceptable to me," said Reed.
The mayor continues to be outspoken in his belief that the Atlanta Public Schools Board under the leadership of Chairman Khaatim Sherrer El are incapable of bringing the district in to compliance by September 30th.
On the heels of the passage of state bill 79, Reed is now seeking legislation from the Georgia General Assembly that would temporarily empower him to appoint additional Atlanta Public Schools Board members. By doing so, the mayor may be attempting to gain control of the nine member board, thereby breaking up a long standing, five-count controlling vote.
(video courtesy of Lori Moore)



